Home Community Liverpool Liverpool Going Forward

Viewing 20 posts - 401 through 420 (of 770 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #49494 Score: 0
    newbalancenewbalance
    Spectator
    190 pts

    C67, hi mate.

    To begin with, I wasn’t a fan of Henderson because I thought he would be a box-to-box type of player. He grew on me when a became Captain even though I didn’t take to the idea. I like the guy. He is better suited in Midfield when he’s accompanied with players like Fabinho and Gini because they are more industrious and read the game better to project our defenders.

    Milner starting yesterday turned out to be an excellent choice by Klopp.

    #49495 Score: 0
    sean the sailor
    Participant
    341 pts

    I’ve absolutely no problem with Henderson. Does a job for the team and passionately cares for the team. Was so delighted for him when he lifted the cl trophy.

    Will go down a Liverpool
    Legend as he lifted number 6

    No player divides opinion for Liverpool
    Fans more then Henderson

    #49501 Score: 1
    Chelsea1967Chelsea1967
    Participant
    66 pts

    Agree lads I am one for supporting our players through thick and thin and hate ongoing agendas against certain players. We have a few players at Chelsea that can never please some.

    #49507 Score: 1
    newbalancenewbalance
    Spectator
    190 pts

    C67, I was aware, of what you pointed out via the other site, but people on here will tell you they are not the greatest of bunches to have a discussion with. It’s like being against a Crocodile and you dare not voice anything different.

    That’s where there is a ‘division’. Personally mate, I have more important things in my life like my Job to think about then be soaked up or sucked into that.

    See how much different and relaxed it is on here – we’re a lot nicer 🙂

    Chelsea1967
    #49553 Score: 0
    PaganPagan
    Participant
    282 pts

    Bit of an addition to my post on cynical fouls, having semi watched the Chelsea game, one of the commentators or pundits when talking about the Southampton goal said the Chelsea player should have fouled the Southampton player, not just dangled a leg out he should have moved in front of him and blocked him. I’m not condoning the tackle on Salah, but what chance do we have when commentators and pundits are saying professional/cynical fouls are part of the game and are encouraging them…..Pagan

    #49640 Score: 1
    Chelsea1967Chelsea1967
    Participant
    66 pts

    Good morning Nil – after City 0 Wolves 2 we might have to create a new thread called Manchester City going backwards. Long way to go and the clash between you guys and City next month will be significant. United losing too made it a really good day. Liverpool can really enjoy the International break off the back of this weekend’s results. 🙂

    newbalance
    #49643 Score: 1
    newbalancenewbalance
    Spectator
    190 pts

    Hahaha, we may be getting ahead of ourselves C67 on that particular idea of a Thread 😀 🙂

    Yeah true next month’s HEAD-TO-HEAD. Could be the turning point of where the Title will be heading.

    Chelsea1967
    #49646 Score: 0
    Oz
    Participant
    45 pts

    I only seen the highlights of our game but from what I’m reading/hearing from others we maybe just deserved the win. I can’t stand the saying “there was contact” when a player dives. FFS I’d love to see these dudes in the mosh pit at a rock concert, they’d spend the whole gig on the floor. Throwing the head back and arms in the air is so unnatural even if you get a touch on the leg. It’s bloody embarrassing to watch IMO.
    For the record I think there was minimal contact on Mane but definitely not enough to go down like he did.
    As a Scouser (adopted) it’s great to see manu struggling and just as good to see city go down again. This season is panning out a lot like last season though where we had a 7 point lead & I still think city will win it.
    Take care cyber chums.

    #49648 Score: 0
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    366 pts

    Oz, I would agree with you in some way regards to their not being enough contact for Mane to go down… but that’s not the question.

    The question is, has he been impeded and its the perfect example because you can see that although Mane could have stayed up, he’d have had to recover his balance in order to play on effectively but time is not on your side when you have the ball at your feet in the opposition’s box.

    I also don’t particularly like the flopping to the ground nonsense but it exists for the reason that players cant signal the refs attention whilst playing on.

    My own definition of a dive may differ from others but when its a case of a player helping the ref to make the right call, I dont consider it to be a dive.

    Shame you only got to see the highlights. It was a tense affair as a live match.

    #49649 Score: 0
    sean the sailor
    Participant
    341 pts

    You listen to shearer on match of the day and the chap is a hypocrite. He said Lovrens push on Lewin in December 17 was a pen for Everton and sat days wasn’t???

    Manes was more of a pen on sat then that.

    He really did make the most of it but I thought it was a pen as he impeded as mak says

    Abraham in the super cup there was much less contact and it was a pen. Both went to var but both played for the pen.

    Albrighton clearly makes a silly challenge.

    Oz, we were the much better side and highlights didn’t do us justice

    #49739 Score: 0
    newbalancenewbalance
    Spectator
    190 pts

    Now This Is One Treat – 50 Goals From A Truly Special Player

    #49860 Score: 0
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    366 pts

    Ok lads, how many chickens do we have?

    #49864 Score: 0
    threepsthreeps
    Participant
    126 pts

    Sorry I’m still counting…

    #49875 Score: 0
    PaganPagan
    Participant
    282 pts

    Mak, just the one, funny looking one though, but it was your choice to make it your badge😁….Pagan

    #49882 Score: 0
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    366 pts

    😉

    #49889 Score: 0
    Oz
    Participant
    45 pts

    Mak, Sean, thanks for the responses & sorry for the late reply lads, I don’t get on here much these days. Sean great to hear we were the much better side, a few mates that have access to watch the games told me the same but they are a bit biased so I wasn’t convinced. Long may it continue.

    #49890 Score: 0
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    366 pts

    I don’t think it was so one sided, regardless of the shot stats. anyway, I’ll see you around mate. have a good one.

    #49898 Score: 1
    Editor
    Keymaster
    442 pts

    Stick around Mak!

    #49900 Score: 1
    threepsthreeps
    Participant
    126 pts

    Yeah stick around Mak. We all know Adlab likes to wind up, Sean has highlighted this many times and rightly so, but I like to think just how much Liverpool must be annoying him to resort to such behavior. I think deep down he is maybe a little jealous after our Champions League win, crazy when you think how good City have it at the moment. Whatever it is, lets just laugh at him instead of quitting or getting angry.

    #49901 Score: 0
    threepsthreeps
    Participant
    126 pts

    Back to football matters, anyone else impressed with Lovren the other day? Sure we were all surprised to see him start instead of Gomez but I thought he did well. He’s had his doubters, with a few high profile clangers, plus a number of injury issues, but deep down he’s a pretty solid defender.

    Matip still first choice when he returns however. I really doubted him before, thinking he was too passive to be a top central defender and also cringed every time he marauded forward (he did lose the ball a lot more then, now lays it off much better), but has definitely made me change my mind.

Viewing 20 posts - 401 through 420 (of 770 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.