Home Community General Football Summer 2023 transfer window

Viewing 20 posts - 521 through 540 (of 767 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208287
    Luckydestiny
    Participant

      In short, either ban contracts over 5 years or allow them, but to dictate terms of amortisation for assets owned by clubs is absurd imo.

      _____________________________

      React below 👇

      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

      Loading spinner
      #208288
      AllyDickWasQuick
      Participant

        Lucky, for the price of Chelsea’s last 3 windows you could have had about 75% of a new ground

        _____________________________

        React below 👇

        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

        Loading spinner
        #208289
        Chucky McChuckface
        Participant

          For the amount of fans the Jammy Todgers have, that’s a bloody expensive tent!

          _____________________________

          React below 👇

          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

          Loading spinner
          #208290
          Editor
          Keymaster

            Well that was that!

            _____________________________

            React below 👇

            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

            Loading spinner
            #208291
            sean the sailor
            Participant

              Ed, Liverpool fans cannot brush this up anyway. We had Lavia last week but wouldnt go the extra 5m after 3 failed bids. We really wanted him. Then we go bid for Caciedo. Then we go back with 60m bid for Lavia. It’s school boy stuff. It’s beyond embarrassing
              Chelsea have got our main target who was Lavia. Chelsea were not even in the equation last week. Domino affect started 18 months ago with edwards going then ward going. We look poor on the pitch as a defensive unit for 12 months. All these are signs that this will end in tears
              We have now inflated the price for any other targets we have. It’s just really hard to fathom all this. It’s absolutely shocking. Really is.
              We move on. Try get few faces in and try move on from this embarrassment asap. We are going to get some stick for this and deservedly so

              _____________________________

              React below 👇

              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

              Loading spinner
              #208292
              threeps
              Participant

                Cant really add anymore to what Sean said. Really embarrassing stuff from Liverpool. I can see us going into the season as is with no proper no 6.

                _____________________________

                React below 👇

                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                Loading spinner
                #208294
                Nike19
                Participant

                  Just mixed messages which is the one that’s the real kick in the teeth.

                  I mentioned earlier; I know we have a history of buying duds, but never have I seen business conducted in this fashion. It’s not even classified as business but instead sheer amateur that’s an embarrassment.

                  We’re bigger and better than this.

                  This is the new season and all we’ve had is this in our faces and Chelsea. Pretty depressed. Need time to heal and hopefully a win at Anfield this Sat and Tiago returns for us.

                  _____________________________

                  React below 👇

                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                  Loading spinner
                  #208295
                  Nike19
                  Participant

                    How do Chelsea spend all this money? I really give up. No rules or just non-existent for some.

                    _____________________________

                    React below 👇

                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                    Loading spinner
                    #208296
                    threeps
                    Participant

                      Nil I posted earlier how Chelsea can spend so much, they have not broken any rules. We only ourselves to blame.

                      _____________________________

                      React below 👇

                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                      Loading spinner
                      #208297
                      Nike19
                      Participant

                        Three p’s yeah I did see that. I can’t get my head around beyond supposed spread payments agreed between 2 clubs for a player.

                        And how amortization fits into this. That sounds more like depreciation yet are both different. Plus. by employing this, how is this then sticking to the original fee agreed?

                        _____________________________

                        React below 👇

                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                        Loading spinner
                        #208298
                        Nike19
                        Participant

                          We have positives too extract that alongside Man City, we’re the only top team holding more established players of quality and service; take Jota, Diaz, Trent, for example. Van Dijk and Alisson still important as with Robertson. Nunez now in a second season.

                          We’re getting swamped into a 19 year old Lavia. Will Caicedo work? Chelsea have far too many players to try and gel in one go and for me yesterday only Chilwell was the stand out.

                          Granted we need Defensive Midfielders and a new Center Half, but it’s more squad depth than a rebuild. Klopp needs to reenforce a system with more discipline and a tight ship. We need to be more aggressive.

                          _____________________________

                          React below 👇

                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                          Loading spinner
                          #208299
                          Luckydestiny
                          Participant

                            Nil, if a team buys a player for 50m over 5 years, it’s 10m per year.

                            That means a club can buy a 50m player and only needs to bring in 10m that same season to balance the books because only 10m of the 50m is needed to be covered that year.

                            However,the club would also need to bring in 10m each season for next 4 years of contract also to cover the deal in its entirety.

                            _____________________________

                            React below 👇

                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                            Loading spinner
                            #208300
                            Editor
                            Keymaster

                              You can’t say Chelsea weren’t in the equation Sean. They tried to sign him from Southampton last summer, in fairness. I’m sure they’ve been tracking him for a long time. That’s not to say it’s not an embarrassing turn of events for Liverpool but this isn’t a case of Chelsea just taking players to stop Liverpool getting their hands on them as it seems to sometimes be made out.

                              _____________________________

                              React below 👇

                              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                              Loading spinner
                              #208301
                              threeps
                              Participant

                                Amortisation is a paper exercise for FFP which is limited to 5 year but not applicable to Chelsea are not in Europe this season. The PLs own rules does not have this 5 years thing and can be spread across the entire 8 years contact which makes it managable.

                                The actual payment is not the same as amortisation and will have been agreed between the clubs, usually 3 or 4 lump sums plus a few performance/achievement clauses.

                                So the fee between the two clubs and amortisation are two different things. Probably best not to be too concerned as they haven’t done anything wrong, be more concerned about our own club.

                                _____________________________

                                React below 👇

                                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                Loading spinner
                                #208302
                                Chucky McChuckface
                                Participant

                                  What I don’t get, and I think we’ve had this dance before, what happens when you sell a player?

                                  You’ve got your 50 million player in, 5 x 10 million for 5 years, you sell him after 3 years for 40 million, so you’ve paid 3 x 10 million per year, plus 40 million for a sale so you’ve only spent 30 million but got 40 million for selling him so you’ve actully made 10 million profit for selling him for 10 million less than the 50 million you paid for him, right?!?!?!?!?

                                  _____________________________

                                  React below 👇

                                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                  Loading spinner
                                  #208303
                                  Luckydestiny
                                  Participant

                                    If you sold him for 40m after 3 years there would only be 20m left on books, it would be drawn down that year as a 20m net positive on the accounts. (40-20).

                                    That might not make sense at first because you would expect 10m loss not 20m profit, because player was bought for 50m and sold for 40m, right?

                                    However, if you add the 30m already paid and accounted for over previous 3 years to the 20m profit recorded on the accounts it’s (-30) +20 =-10m

                                    It’s shows as a 20m positive after 3 years because 30m has already been recorded as losses over previous 3 years

                                    _____________________________

                                    React below 👇

                                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                    Loading spinner
                                    #208304
                                    Nike19
                                    Participant

                                      Good clear explanation guys; Thank you. Appreciated.

                                      _____________________________

                                      React below 👇

                                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                      Loading spinner
                                      #208305
                                      threeps
                                      Participant

                                        Nobody would sell a player for 50m in 5 installments. I think your getting actual payments and amortisation mixed up? Not the same thing!

                                        If you sell a player before you’ve paid all installments you still need to pay.

                                        _____________________________

                                        React below 👇

                                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                        Loading spinner
                                        #208306
                                        Mikus LFC
                                        Participant

                                          It’s us who have messed up. Firstly, by not refreshing the midfield early enough. When we failed to attract Tchouameni last season, we didn’t look for alternatives, but you wonder if part of the money earmarked for him was used on Nunez instead.

                                          I think a big problem is we have been purely reactive rather than proactive in refreshing the squad. I suspect MacAllister & Szoboszlai were going to be the only major incomings up until Henderson & Fabinho left. Only then I think have we started looking to recruit others, but it looks like we’ve turned up too late to the party with some of the targets.

                                          The thing is though, there are still deeper concerns there. The idea a new defensive midfielder is going to solve all our issues is I think wishful thinking. Half of me thinks Klopp may just about find a new system/tactic and we could have a reasonable season. The other half of me thinks the jig could be up with the Klopp era, and his cycle is coming to an end. Quite a few departments not right at the club for me.

                                          _____________________________

                                          React below 👇

                                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                          Loading spinner
                                          #208308
                                          Luckydestiny
                                          Participant

                                            Threeps, I’m talking purely in terms of accounting. In general I think fees are paid off quicker than they are amortised as usually a lump sum is paid up front.

                                            _____________________________

                                            React below 👇

                                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                            Loading spinner
                                          Viewing 20 posts - 521 through 540 (of 767 total)
                                          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.