- This topic has 2,527 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 57 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
“Because we dont have any other fit centrebacks.
How has this passed you by?!”
Talk of stating the bleeding obvious, looks like basic intelligence passed you by a long time ago. Why did I mention us not using Endo or Gravenberch then, if I was not aware of the injuries, duh?
The issue here is who is going to play CB going forward, and I gave two options, Chambers and Ndiaye, and as long as they can do a good job there, I don’t care if Chambers is a left-back or not – have you never seen a RB, LB or midfielder deployed at CB before, and slotting in well there?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
PSG bought Akliouche €50m, while Ajax value Godts at €60m.
Thus if PSG get Godts, they will pay an absolute maximum of €110m for two wingers, or £95m.
And if they sell Barcola to any club, then a price tag of £95m seems reasonable, because they get two wingers in exchange for Barcola, without paying anything.
But my stance remains the same, if Liverpool do indeed get Barcola, we should pay a maximum of £80m max.
If PSG take the piss, and refuse to budge from a ridiculous price, then we walk away and look elsewhere – No Deal.
There are other better priced top wingers around, and no, I won’t waste my time naming them again, you all know who they are.
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
.
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
For the love of Fowler are we going to have another season long bore fest of Songman reminding everyone how much Barcola costs and that some other player who had a good game on motd coat far less?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yes indeed, If Barcola cost is too high, No Deal.
We can’t repeat the Isak mistake of paying a dumb £45m premium, over his correct value of £80m.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Newsflash Songman: You don’t get to decide that.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Read or heard, can’t actually remember where from, that we might be carrying out the strategy of letting other clubs agree fees and terms with a selling club before we swoop in. Take Mbaye for example, agree 35m or whatever with Leverkusen and then we match it and take him. If we went straight in he’d be 50 or 60.
Could we be doing something with Diomande? No, the other one, almost joined forest and now we are linked.
Other news, Arsenal enquired about Romero from Sours? Saliba injury worse than reported? VdV penned new contract so scratch that one off thankfully.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
For the love of Fowler are we going to have another season long bore fest of Songman reminding everyone how much Barcola costs and that some other player who had a good game on motd coat far less?
Is he not allowed to then? I thought it was a free fourm for debate, is it only what you want to debate 3ps? Also, is he not right? Barcola is a £80m player maximum. We pay silly money out of desperation…see the Isak deal for reference.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Who has decided he’s an “£80mil player maximum”?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
and your valuation is….
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Doesn’t answer the question.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Ah moonster, songman mentions isak once a day chum. We get it.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Windows your neck in Moonster.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
What i find funny the most is how many times that dimwit edits his short posts haha. He must just type with rage or with a calculator in one hand and keep getting things wrong.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Windows your neck in Moonster.
Windows?
Wow! now 3ps is dictating what can and cant be said! jeez! This forum is funny at times.
Ah moonster, songman mentions isak once a day chum. We get it.
He may, but thats his choice, its those that get the hump about it that need to allow him to, and move on with their conversations.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Song: ‘Talk of stating the bleeding obvious, looks like basic intelligence passed you by a long time ago.’
It’s just necessary, your opinions are always I’m right, you’re wrong and if you disagree with me, I’ll just childishly insult you.
I’ve had enough of that and the contents of your posts. Most on here have an opinion, are happy to spar with others and accept disagreements as part of what makes a forum interesting and sometimes even change their mind.
I won’t be reading or commenting on your posts in future – that way I won’t constantly hear repetitive, baked in and baseless opinions. Neither will I have to read playground insults.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
It´s better to hear him moan about the price tag than not get the transfer, we all have to realize that he is an accountant and as such he is the only one that can determine the right transfer fee for players.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Got a sneaky we may try and grab Konsa (who also can play RB). We need someone. No clue on Jacquet, Leoni will be fit in 2035, and Frimpong and Bradley simply take turns to be keyholder to the treatment room.
Arsenal also may be looking not knowing how long Saliba will be out.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Well, rumour has it Rob, we’re trying to hijack the Diomande deal, Ousmane Diomande! Thought he was off to Forrest, but maybe not now. Konsa would make sense though, only issue would the price and age.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
That is a big strong lad, should fit the profile of centerbacks we are looking for.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yes, bingo, he fit the profile and he was linked previously, but that’s just speculation right now…its a position we need covered but the issue is going to be the home grown quota and that where Konsa would be a better fit IMO
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.