The price Liverpool payed Newcastle for Isak is nothing to do with Isak.
That’s between the clubs.
But it’s a stupid price. In business you don’t just pay any price you’re quoted, and the same goes in football, that’s why you see several clubs pulling out of highly overpriced deals. Sometimes the best deal is the one you don’t make.
Similar strikers, with similar stats as Isak were going for £60m to £80m thus summer, so what is so special about Isak to demand a £44m premium? In my opinion, absolutely nothing. And even worse he’s highly injury-prone, with a very bad attitude, unlike Ekitike, for example.
The only striker who can command such a premium is Haaland, and his phenomenal stats back him up, or even Harry Kane at his peak.
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
.
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
-
This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
