Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Chelsea had an acerage of 53% ball possession in the two seasons, but i don’t remember what benefits that has brought to Chelsea. This season, our ball possession is low, but our scoring is high, and we are yet to score from a set piece or a penalty. Bit people are already crying that Chelsea had a low ball possession? I’m very happy with 10% possession but scoring goals and winning games, instead of dominating games and losing for 1-0. If youadd the number of chances we have missed, we could have been out of sight. I can see rival fans are jealous. Cole Palmer is back, Jao Pedro is scoring, Morgan Rodgers is doing the business. I can’t complain.
Arsenal will surely defend their title with ease, our target now is to return the the champions league football first, then build from there.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Dear fellow Chelsea fans,
Chelsea Football Club, founded in 1905, has long stood as one of the most respected institutions in world football. It is deeply concerning to witness what feels like a steady decline in the club’s identity, structure, and competitive standards.
The current leadership approach raises serious questions. Decisions appear inconsistent and, at times, disconnected from the traditions and footballing philosophy that once defined Chelsea Football Club. Historically, this was a club that attracted elite managers—figures such as José Mourinho, Guus Hiddink, and Carlo Ancelotti—individuals who commanded authority and shaped the direction of the team.
There was even a time when André Villas-Boas was considered insufficiently experienced for the role. Today, however, the managerial appointments suggest a noticeable shift in standards and expectations. It increasingly appears that the head coach has limited influence, with key decisions being driven elsewhere. This raises a fundamental question: which top-level coach would willingly accept such constraints?
The continued retention of the current leadership structure, despite underwhelming results, is difficult to understand. Concerns have been raised regarding the influence of Behdad Eghbali and the overarching footballing direction. It seems that managers who challenge this approach—such as Mauricio Pochettino and Enzo Maresca—struggle to operate effectively within the system.
Most importantly, one must acknowledge the loyal supporters. Match-going fans, in particular, invest significant time, money, and emotional energy, and deserve to see a team that reflects the club’s proud heritage. Even as an overseas supporter, the frustration and disappointment are deeply felt.
At this point, constructive reflection and accountability are essential. Supporters naturally want what is best for the club, and many feel that meaningful change is necessary to restore Chelsea to its former stature. Engagement, dialogue, and responsible decision-making will be key to rebuilding trust and ensuring a stronger future.
Kind Regards
Young_Blue_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
This is what one pundit who hates Chelsea said at the start of the season.😂😂
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Well, well, i predicted this on Tuesday night,and i wasn’t wrong. Though i’m disappointed with how things ended up for Maresca and the club,ithink at wnd of the day, i’m a Chelsea fan. I havw to remain loyal to the club. It was no secret that i was a Maresca fan. Bit life mist go on.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Well, i’m sorry to say this, but Maresca is 90% gone now. I can’t see him survinvg. Maybe he knows his goose is cooked i don’t know. But it’s looking like that.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Am I the only one who thinks that the introduction of Palmer disrupted our attacking rhythm? I believe Maresca has a tough task ahead in reintegrating him into the team. Since Palmer’s substitution, our attack has improved significantly. Additionally, I’ve observed that Palmer and Enzo struggle to fit into the same lineup.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
One is a red card, the other is a yellow card. I prefer bot to speak, if i speak I will be in trouble. 😏😏
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I suspect if Palmer decided to leave Chelsea he will have better alternatives than United. He would want to go back to City. but i can’t see that happening now. Despite the form of Estavao, Palmer remains Chelsea best player and main man. he contributes both goals and assists in equal measures, something that is rare these days. Besides, the United system won’t suit Palmer as he likes to play with wingers and a no 8.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
In the first half, Nottingham Forest controlled the midfield and took the game to Chelsea.
The Chelsea midfield trio of Malo Gusto, Romeo Lavia, and Andre Santos were disjointed. No cohesion. Nothing was clicking and it affected the attacking play too.
But immediately Moises Caicedo was introduced in the second half, everything changed. He brought a balance to the team, they started playing with purpose and goals started pouring in.
This is why I continue saying that Moises Caicedo is the most important Chelsea player, followed by Cole Palmer.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Going for an Arswnal.win today.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I have to say, the club’s handling of the Jackson saga has been disastrous. First, they told him to find a new club and froze him out of the team. Then, when he finally secures a team that wants him, they ask him to return? That is completely wrong. Even if he comes back, will he be happy playing for Chelsea again?
I don’t understand why we discard players as soon as they’re no longer needed. This happened with Chalobah, Nkunku, Chilwell, and Sterling—the list goes on. Players notice this behavior and may be hesitant to join Chelsea in the future. We need to be careful about how we handle our players.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Do you realize that pundits are not trained referees and are merely offering their opinions on contentious decisions? I don’t pay attention to what pundits say about Chelsea or anything related to the club; I’ve already made peace with that. If your argument is based on a pundit claiming Chelsea were gifted the points today, then count me out of that discussion. I’m not interested in hearing what these biased pundits have to say, as they rarely remain neutral.
The match officials agreed that it was a foul, and any other opinion holds no weight. We’re wasting our time speculating on what could have been, especially when emotions are running high. Personally, I don’t dwell too much on refereeing decisions. Whether it’s last season or this season, if my team loses, I hold the players and the coach accountable because that’s where we can make a difference. Refereeing decisions are beyond our control, so there’s no reason to grieve over them.
Perhaps this debate has run its course. I’m looking forward to the big game tomorrow!
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
What does that have to do with Chelsea? Chelsea doesn’t choose who is in the VAR or who officiates the game. Just because you’re frustrated with the VAR decisions doesn’t mean they are incorrect. The rules are there to be followed. Was it a foul or not? If the professionally trained referees determined it was a foul, then the opinion of a biased football fan doesn’t hold much weight.
Chelsea scored two goals and kept a clean sheet; that is the official scoreline. Anything else is purely hypothetical.
I understand you wanted Fulham to win, but the result was otherwise. It’s time to accept the outcome and move on.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
A foul is a foul whether accidental or intentional. The difference is, accdidental doesn’t carry punishment.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Your team is the beneficiary of one of the most scandalous VAR decisions on the history. So of you think the decisons were wrong, then you should write to the premier league. Simple as that. Whaf has Chelsea got to do with this?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I don’t respond to posts that is put to wind up.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I remember very well, we once had an equalising goal against Liveepool disallowed because Someone was off in the third phase of the game. We were told, rules arw there to bw followed. We had Cucurella’s hair being pulled against the Spurs and in the process to conceded an equaliser, we complained but we told rules arw there to be followed. Here we are people are complaining about VAR because they percieve Chelsea has benefitted, but if the decision was the other way round, they would have been saying it was the correct outcome. If that is not hypocrisy i don’t k ow what it is.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Good scoreline so far, the team needs CB and Keeper more than another attacking midfielder or a winger. I hope our board sees that.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
It was a perfect performance from the boys and absolutely genius tactics from Maresca. I must say, this was a redemption for him. There have been doubts and criticism not only from rival fans and the media but also from a section of his own fanbase regarding his ability. So for him to lift the CWC is the ultimate redemption.
Cole Palmer is currently at the peak of his prowess. He is enjoying his football again, and the addition of Pedro helps relieve some pressure from him. They look like a dynamic duo. Additionally, Neto is putting up some impressive numbers; I hope his second season will be a breakthrough one. I’m not very familiar with Gittens, as I rarely watch Bundesliga football. If we can pull off the Rodrygo deal, it would be a significant coup for Chelsea. Caicedo and Enzo currently form the best double pivot a team can have.
I was pleased with Gusto; he was excellent again when told to play to his strengths and not invert into midfield. It was refreshing to see Maresca abandon that approach. Chalobah has been great; every time I watch him play, he puts in a solid shift, yet he is being linked with a move away from the club. He is the perfect partner for Colwill, bringing pace and physicality, while Colwill offers a good passing range. Yes, we need an experienced center-back, but not at the expense of what we already have. Badiashile and Disasi should be considered for departure.
We also need a world-class keeper to compete for the title. I don’t think we can rely on Sanchez and Jorgensen.
I prefer not to speak if i speak i will be in trouble.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts
