Home Community Man City Wolves vs City

Viewing 12 posts - 13 through 24 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #25761 Score: 0
    AdlabAdlab
    Participant
    230 pts

    Where is VAR

    #25762 Score: 0
    AdlabAdlab
    Participant
    230 pts

    Jesus on. Sane too should be 25mins to go.
    I just cant see us scoring today.

    #25763 Score: 0
    nine nine nine
    Moderator
    733 pts

    City not at their best today and the Wolves Keeper has made a couple of good saves too. Solves dangerous on the break and have pace. Mendy brilliant going forwards but a bit questionable defensively. I still fancy City to win it though providing they don’t get caught out on the break.

    #25764 Score: 0
    Big Jim
    Spectator
    183 pts

    Fair assessment nine. Wolves a bit lucky on their goal. But until VAR comes in those issues will happen. City didnt quite click today but that happens. Mendy does look a bit suspect in defence and certainly wasn’t as good going forwards today. Not sure why Mahrez was brought on so late? But fair play to Wolves, well organised today.

    #25765 Score: 0
    AdlabAdlab
    Participant
    230 pts

    Sane seems right out of touch.
    Referee doing the Premier League bidding. If in doubt Scudamore on record hoping the league “would be closer”
    Woodwork three times, not one decision from Atkinson.
    Walker and Mendy poor today.
    Oh well 35 games left!

    #25766 Score: 0
    Big Jim
    Spectator
    183 pts

    Sorry Adlab, but with all due respect I have to dissagree a little bit. There were a few clever little fouls on Sterling in the first half but it’s rear that they are given. I think both Dave and Kun made the most of their penalty claims. The handball wasn’t obvious at first and Atkinson was knighted. It was even a hard call for the lino. Offside was easier to call. And even Ederson didnt claim handball. We did get plenty of other calls and many in dangerous areas. I think it was just one of those days in all fairness. Jim

    #25767 Score: 0
    AdlabAdlab
    Participant
    230 pts

    We’ll agree to differ!!
    If there was VAR what would have happened? No goal on TWO counts. The sooner we have it the better. Sorry Jim but I have no truck with 8 minutes Atkinson. Yet another shocking referee.
    Waiting to hear what Pep says after the Ads .
    Whats up with Sane?

    #25768 Score: 0
    Big Jim
    Spectator
    183 pts

    Oh don’t get me wrong Adlab, VAR would have definitely have ruled out that goal. But the PL authorities decided in their infinite wisdom that it wasn’t needed. It will be in next season I am sure. Jim

    #25770 Score: 0
    AdlabAdlab
    Participant
    230 pts

    Pep saying nothing says it all!

    #25771 Score: 0
    Big Jim
    Spectator
    183 pts

    Not enough on Dave for a Pen for me and Aguero probably was a Pen but catching his trailing leg with a slight contact is a hard for a ref to see imo. We had our chances but just didn’t take them.

    #25772 Score: 0
    nine nine nine
    Moderator
    733 pts

    Difficult place to go earrly in the season and Wolves are a decent side. It might be two points dropped or it might be one point won.

    Had City taken their chances they would have won but Wolves were good on the break. I don’t think anyone will get an easy game at Molineux.

    #25780 Score: 0
    Big Jim
    Spectator
    183 pts

    What did those that watched the game on here think of Gundogwan’s performance today?

Viewing 12 posts - 13 through 24 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.