Home Community General Football Week 29: W’sTFing point?

Viewing 6 posts - 121 through 126 (of 126 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #87758 Score: 0
    nine nine nine
    Moderator
    878 pts

    Brian, City are so under the microscope with UEFA even if Kane was to leave open to conjecture and Levy was prepared to sell him to a PL Club which would seem unlikely to me. I’m not sure City would be in a position to bid for him given their UEFA problems. City will now religiously look to work well within FFP rules from here on in imo.

    #87899 Score: 0
    Brian blue
    Participant
    369 pts

    Nine…I will wait to see how it all pans out. UEFA will be desperate for funds and I can see a huge fine appearing as a trade off to this protracted affair. Legal bills are mounting as well
    Who is going to pay for those lush HQ and free travel and lunches

    #87925 Score: 0
    nine nine nine
    Moderator
    878 pts

    Brian, the current situation with City has gone past UEFA it’s all down to CAS now buddie.

    #88238 Score: 0
    Chelsea1967Chelsea1967
    Participant
    78 pts

    Nice name for the thread Chuckster as it turned out.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 3 days ago by Chelsea1967Chelsea1967.
    #88264 Score: 0
    Brian blue
    Participant
    369 pts

    Nine..I know…then it is not over until its over, then.

    #88297 Score: 0
    nine nine nine
    Moderator
    878 pts

    Of course Brian and that’s how it should be my point really was that City won’t push the boundaries on transfers given where they are now even if they get off the ban because UEFA’s eyes will be very firmly on them going forwards and they will have to be squeaky clean.

Viewing 6 posts - 121 through 126 (of 126 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.