“Not sure the PL ever said the opposite, their whole case is that City fabricated deals, not the sponsors. They said the sponsors paid the amount in the real contract and ADUG paid the inflated bit in the sham contract.”
Agree Alfie, so not understanding Etihad’s stance. Normal circumstances would suggest that it was ADUG that has caused harm to a sponsors reputation and should be sought for damages but of course Etihad and ADUG is far from a normal relationship.
Still it has City fans thinking they’re bringing a big dog to the fight.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
